In today’s interconnected world, the ethical dimensions of consumer choices are increasingly vital. Examining the ownership and operational affiliations of everyday brands can reveal associations with complex geopolitical situations.
Understanding these connections is pivotal in making conscientious purchasing and employment decisions.
1. Always
Personal care products owned by Procter and Gamble, investing heavily in an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. To take a stand against this association, refrain from buying or selling Always products and avoid working for the brand.
2. Amika
A hair care brand manufactured on occupied Palestinian land. Show opposition to this association by choosing not to buy or sell Amika products.
3. Aussie
Owned by Procter and Gamble, Aussie invests in an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. Refrain from purchasing or selling Aussie products and avoid working for the brand.
4. Axe
This deodorant brand is owned by Unilever, which also owns Ben & Jerry’s. Unilever’s strategies to circumvent Ben & Jerry’s decision in Israel raise concerns. Avoid buying, selling, or working for Axe to voice disapproval of these actions.
See Also: Supermarket Chains Tied to Israel Support: Consider a Boycott
5. Braun
Under the ownership of Procter and Gamble, Braun’s association with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine warrants reconsidering buying, selling, or working for the brand.
6. Clear Blue
Owned by Procter and Gamble, Clear Blue’s association with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine suggests refraining from buying, selling, or working for the brand.
7. Dove
A skincare brand under Unilever’s ownership, Dove is affected by Unilever’s complex Israeli distribution strategies concerning Ben & Jerry’s. Consider avoiding buying, selling, or working for Dove as a statement against these practices.
8. Gillette
Procter and Gamble’s ownership ties Gillette to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. Make a statement by avoiding buying, selling, or working for Gillette.
9. Head and Shoulders
Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Head and Shoulders’ connection to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine raises concerns. Consider refraining from buying, selling, or working for Head and Shoulders.
10. Herbal Essences
Owned by Procter and Gamble, Herbal Essences’ affiliation with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine suggests reconsidering buying, selling, or working for the brand.
11. Lux
Owned by Unilever, Lux is conected to the situation with Ben & Jerry’s in Israel. To oppose these actions, consider refraining from buying, selling, or working for Lux.
12. Lynx
Another brand owned by Unilever and tied to the Ben & Jerry’s situation. To express concern, avoid purchasing, selling, or working for Lynx.
See Also: Pharmacy Giants Backing Israel: Time to Boycott?
13. Olay
Owned by Procter and Gamble, the brand’s association with an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reconsidering buying, selling, or working for Olay.
14. Old Spice
Under the ownership of Procter and Gamble, Old Spice’s connection to an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, raises concerns. You might reconsider buying, selling, or working for Old Spice.
15. Oral B
Owned by Procter and Gamble, Oral B’s ties to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, warrant reconsideration when buying, selling, or working for Oral B.
16. Pampers
Procter and Gamble owns Pampers, and its production and affiliation with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggest reevaluation when buying, selling, or working for Pampers.
17. Pantene
Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Pantene’s association with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reconsidering buying, selling, or working for Pantene.
18. Procter & Gamble
With ties to an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, rethinking buying, selling, or working for P&G is important to express concerns regarding their investments.
19. Rexona
Another Unilever-owned brand entangled in the Ben & Jerry’s situation, it’s important to consider refraining from buying, selling, or working for Rexona to voice disapproval.
20. Seven Seas
Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Seven Seas’ association with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reconsidering when buying, selling, or working for Seven Seas.
21. Sudocrem
Sudocrem, owned by Israeli pharmaceuticals giant Teva, is involved in operations within Occupied Palestine. Consider your support when buying, selling, or working for Sudocrem.
22. Tampax
Procter and Gamble’s ownership of Tampax connects it to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, signaling a need for thought when purchasing, vending, or working with Tampax.
23. Tresemme
Under Unilever’s ownership, Tresemme’s association with the circumvented decision to sell products in Israel reflects the importance of reconsideration in buying, selling, or working for Tresemme.
24. Venus
Venus, a personal care product for women owned by Procter and Gamble, has ties to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. Careful consideration is needed when purchasing, selling, or working for Venus.
25. Vicks
Being under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Vicks has connections to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. This association prompts a reevaluation when purchasing, selling, or working with Vicks.
26. Walmart
Walmart’s swift response to the Israeli conflict and the absence of support for charities in Gaza warrant consideration in shopping at Walmart or working for the company.
As the market continues to evolve, consumer responsibility grows ever more critical. This exploration underscores the importance of being aware of the broader contexts behind brand ownership and operations.
It encourages individuals to weigh these factors when making choices, whether as a consumer or a professional, in a quest to align personal decisions with ethical considerations.
